SEO & Performance
SEO Website Audit
An SEO audit is only as useful as what happens after it — a long list of generic recommendations doesn't help if nobody prioritizes or implements them. I run audits with a clear priority order (indexability issues first, then architecture, then finer details) and I'm equally able to implement the fixes directly rather than handing off a report.
This covers the full technical and structural picture: crawlability, site speed, metadata, structured data, and internal linking.
What Gets Reviewed
- checkCrawlability and indexing status via Search Console and a direct site crawl
- checkMetadata coverage and quality across all indexable pages
- checkCore Web Vitals and page speed
- checkStructured data presence and validity
- checkInternal linking structure and orphan pages
- checkContent gaps against the site's actual target topics
What You Get
A prioritized list of issues ordered by expected impact, not just a raw dump of everything a crawler tool flagged — many automated audit tools surface dozens of low-impact warnings alongside the handful of issues that actually matter, and separating those two categories is most of the value of a manual review.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does an audit take?add
Depends on site size and complexity — a small marketing site is a much smaller undertaking than a large, content-heavy site with hundreds of indexed pages and a more complex architecture to review.
Do you implement the fixes or just report on them?add
Both, depending on what's wanted — a standalone audit report, or the audit plus direct implementation of the fixes in the codebase, which is usually the faster path to actual improvement.
How is this different from a free automated SEO tool?add
Automated tools are useful for surfacing a broad list of potential issues but don't prioritize well and often flag low-impact warnings alongside genuine problems. A manual audit adds judgment about what actually matters for this specific site.